You are invited to respond with your opinion on issues.

Diversity of opinion is expected and invited. We do ask that you take responsibility for your positions by signing what you post. We also ask that you participate with the civility that all of us – including yourself – deserve.

While Citizens First will often make organizational recommendations, we believe that the ultimate power to make decisions rests with all of us as engaged citizens. Truth is not a commodity owned by any individual or group. Through civil engagement we can discover common ground.

A Position Statement from Jeannie Stosser and Georgia Anne Faulkenham

Dear Friends:

For the past four years, we have been attempting to create a first-class shopping destination on South Main Street in Blacksburg. We knew from the beginning that this would be a legacy project - and we wanted it to be top-rate. We knew we had the opportunity to take this mostly-deserted end of Main Street and make it something special.
We spent considerable time consolidating the property and then identifying a nationally-known developer, Fairmount Partners, to take over the
project.
We write because Blacksburg Town Council will soon decide whether to attempt to stop the South Main project, as well as any new
retail development or expansion of existing facilities in Blacksburg.
In the next few days, Town Council will make a
decision that will impact the future of retail in Blacksburg for the next twenty years.
The decision? Should the South Main project proceed under the rules set by Town Council last May or will Town Council change the rules mid-process?
In the next couple of days Town Council will decidedwheth er to acknowledge that after last year's rezoning and proffer approval and following numerous preliminary reviews and approvals this
year, Fairmount Partners is "vested" in its rights to bring that project here.
Or, whether Blacksburg will do anything to either (a) keep retail out of Blacksburg or (b) micromanage its arrival to a degree that no one
will come.
Either way, Blacksburg loses.
If Blacksburg decides to challenge the projects vested rights, costly litigation will ensue - and many of the national retailers we had hoped would come to Blacksburg will likely walk away
to projects where they are wanted by the local community leadership.
Strong public support existed last year for the South Main project. Now, a small group of vocal citizens - who have as their primary goal to stop any development in Blacksburg - appear set to kill
the project.
At the end of last month, Blacksburg Town Council
undertook consideration of an ordinance aimed at killing comprehensive retail development in Blacksburg - either through new projects or the
expansion of existing buildings.
Review of this ordinance is being rushed through the Planning Commission and Town Council in an effort - mainly - to control the development of the South Main project. Yet, the impact of the
ordinance is far more reaching.
First, you may have heard, the South Main project has changed from what was presented to Town Council.
This is not true. Nothing about the 2006 proffers has changed. Everything planned on the project is within the proffers adopted by Town Council in 2006.
Second, last year, Fairmount Partners worked with the Town Staff and the Town Council on a set of proffers under which zoning for the South Main project was granted. Since the evening of the enactment of the Special Use Permit, Fairmount Partners has moved forward to make the mixed-use center a reality. Early in this project, Fairmount
Partners went to the Town to see if there was funding for infrastructure improvements or structured parking. They were told that the Town had no money - even though they supported the project - and,more importantly, they were told "you have to do this on your own." And so, they did.
They worked within the parameters that the Town of Blacksburg created.
The challenges in developing Blacksburg as a shopping destination have been considerable.
But - relying on the Town's word - progress has been made.
Many local people said that national retailers would not look at Blacksburg. Fairmount Partners proved the nay-sayers wrong.
Today, first-class national retailers have signed up to become part of the South Main project. Retail stores like Talbot's, Anne Taylor Loft, and Cold Water Creek and lifestyle centers like Gold's Gym have all lined up to be part of this exciting project.
Yet,because of many of the constraints agreed to in the proffers, the mixed-used development desired by the Town and Fairmount Partners has
been difficult - if not impossible - to achieve. The market realities of the marketplace - and Blacksburg's viability as a shopping destination - have created an environment where the success of the project requires the participation of a larger anchor tenant in the retail center. Over the past 11 months, Fairmount Partners has visited
many, many national and regional retailers of all shapes and sizes.
The market has spoken.
If Blacksburg wants this retail center, the center will have to include a major anchor tenant to be viable. This was actually contemplated in the 2006 proffers.
Third, Town Council is placing in jeopardy
considerable economic gain for the Town. The South Main project will add significant
new revenue to the budget in new resources without raising taxes on the citizens of Blacksburg.
Finally, Town Council's consideration of 0rdinance 1450 puts not only the South Main project - but future projects in jeopardy
as well. No one seems to know exactly which properties will be affected by Ordinance 1450.
If you want the South Ma in project to go forward, you mustact now!

Please contact Town Council (contact information
below)and ask them to consider this issue carefully.
Ask them not to rush an issue of such importance with suchfar-reaching implications.
And, ask them not to apply the Ordinance 1450 to the South Main project.

1. To do so is unfair. We believe that this change of course by Town Council is not only unlawful but remarkably unfair to Fairmount Partners, which has spent nearly a million dollars relying upon the 2006 proffers
approved by Town Council. Blacksburg cannot be allowed to change the rules during the process. Months of work have gone into implementing the existing conditions and guidelines.

2. To do so fails to acknowledge the Town's
Comprehensive Plan regarding this area.
The South Main project is EXACTLY what is called for the Town's Comprehensive Plan for this part of Main Street. This end of Main Street is a hodge-podge of deserted buildings and vacant lots;
yet, it is a gateway to the Town.

3. To do so will damage Blacksburg's reputation
and future. Over the past few months, we have learned much about the national reputation Blacksburg holds in the retail world. We can
assure you it will be 10 to 15 years before another effort will get this close to producing the potential project to be developed on South Main. Besides the fact that no real estate tract exists to hold such a retail center in Blacksburg, national retailers have long institutional memories. Why would anyone ever bother to try? The treatment Fairmount Partners ultimately receives in this process will speak volumes about the character of Blacksburg.

4. To do so will eliminate this source of new
fundsfor the Town's budget. Finally, Blacksburg needs the tax revenue. As we mentioned above, conservative estimates put the positive tax impact
of the project at over $1,000,000 per year for Blacksburg. The Town's current budget, which is woefully inadequate in many areas of community
service and promotion, is only $7,000,000. Blacksburg's current revenues (not related to intra-government transfers or license-related
fees) appeared to be around $10,000,000 during fiscal year 2006. The South Main project will add an estimated $1,000,000 a year to the budget in new resources without raising taxes on the citizens of Blacksburg. What would Blacksburg do with more funds? Promote The Lyric more aggressively? Refurbish the community center pool?
Improve town bike paths or green space? The opportunities are endless.

5. Finally, to do so puts the Town in a
lose/lose situation. If Town Council says the project cannot go forward as planned, expensive litigation will result. AND, the Town likely lose many of the planned retail tenants - if not the entire project. People may well go where the local leadership wants them. Please take a moment and contact the members of Town Council.

We need your help. And, we need for you to act TODAY. The opponents of any level of progress in Blacksburg are fully engaged. They believe killing the South Main project - and future development - is a positive result. Do you agree?

If not, please act today. This critical decision is
imminent.

Thank you

Jeanne and Georgia Anne

Town Council contact information:

SUSAN ANDERSON
Phone#: (540) 231-8041
E-mail: sanderson@blacksburg.gov

MARY HOLLIMAN
Phone#: (540) 951-0467
E-mail: mholliman@blacksburg.gov

PAUL LANCASTER
Phone#: (540) 231-6997
E-mail: plancaster@blacksburg.gov

DONALD LANGREHR
Phone#: (540) 831-6580
E-mail: dlangrehr@blacksburg.gov

AL LEIGHTON
Phone#: (540) 552-4591
E-mail: aleighton@blacksburg.gov

RON RORDAM , Mayor
Phone#: (540) 961-1148
E-mail: rrordam@blacksburg.gov

THOMAS SHERMAN
Phone#: (540) 231-8342
E-mail: tsherman@blacksburg.gov

mis-informed or deliberate skewing?

I would like to believe that all of the opposition to ordinance 1450 are just mal-informed about its intended application to developement in Blacksburg. Ordinance 1450 gives Blacksburg the power to keep large format retailers and other massive structures from being built in a location that will cause a negative impact on the surrounding businesses, infrastructure, and so on. The special use permit will be granted to such an operation if it is deemed an economically and environmentally positive step in the responsible growth of our community. It is not designed to inhibit growth. It is designed to promote intelligent and responsible growth.
Travelling down Main Street, Roanoke Street, Jackson street, Airport Rd, and others, one can find signs both supporting and opposing ordinance 1450. The difference is that the signs supporting 1450 are in the yards of residents and windows of local businesses. The signs opposing 1450 are on the property of apartment complexes and real estate agencies that have an investment in the South Main project.
Are these people concerned with responsible growth, or are they just investing in a sure-fire, but irresponsible plan that will have a negative impact on the surrounding area.
I totally support a project that revitalizes the South Main Street area in question, but I am against a Wal-Mart being included. Fairmount has deliberately mis-informed both residents, town council members, and possibly even investors. Their tactics show that they are a morally-inept firm that is not concerned about the negative impact their projects may cause on existing businesses, surrounding neighborhoods, schools, and already busy roads.
I have faith that the residents of Blacksburg want responsible growth and will show their support for an ordinance that gives the town more power to grow in a way that benefits both residents and investors without harming existing businesses.
I do question why anyone would want to conduct business with a firm like Fairmount, who in the case of this project, has lied and deliberately decieved many people.
It is my opinion that the town should try to work with another firm if possible. We as citizens should make it known that we will hold development firms to their promises and accountable for their actions.

rebuttal

I'd like to rebutt this position statement from the land owner of the south main property - jeanne stosser.

She mentions "costly litigation" if ordinance 1450 passes and the town tries to enforce it on the South Main development:

Well, I agree with that. There will be COSTLY litigation. We will raise the money via a grassroots campaign and the many organizations
around the nation DEVOTED to preventing this kind of raping and extortion of small towns. I will be a big contributor to that fund.

I have already contacted a land use attorney that specializes in these types of cases.

She also says:
"First, you may have heard, the South Main project has changed from what was presented to Town Council. This is not true. Nothing about
the 2006 proffers has changed."

THIS IS NOT A TRUE STATEMENT!

The proffer statement and plan (i.e., what the land owner is legally obligated to do) submitted duirng the rezoning is virtually blank of
buildings and roads. It merely contains setbacks and vegetative barriers. The next very pretty picture shows the nice development that we all hoped would come. it is footnoted with "proposed layout for illustrative purposes" - which means "not legally binding".

The NEW PLAN is the old layout with the buildings and roads added and bears little resemable to the "proposed plan for illustrative purposes". In fact, it has a big box store, a large parking lot and certainly does not "enhance the general character of Blacksburg".

Anyone can clearly see that this was planned all along.

And last night, adam fishman (of fairmont properties) damned himself by stating to the media that (paraphrased) "of course, there will be
a big box in that shopping center. it doesn't work without one." Are we to believe that fairmont properties - famed developer of shopping
centers didn't realize this last spring? If he only now sees that, then it doesn't appear that he is very good at what he does and perhaps we'd rather he didn't build a shopping center in our town. After all, what else might he be mistaken about?

Next, she asks that we "ask the town council not to rush an issue of such importance".
Wow! What a turnabout of opinion after rushing the rezoning ordinance just a year ago. If we hadn't rushed that, we could have zoned it appropriately under the new MIXED USE classification and then we (the town) and they (stosser and fairmont) wouldn't be in this position. ordinance 1450 is an attempt by our town to rectify being sloppy last spring. We need to pass it and force fairmont and friends back to the negotiating table.

In regards to her financial statements, my research into big box retailers is not quite so rosy. I've seen statements like "big box retailers return 0.06 cents per dollar spent back to the town" (on the positive side) to "big box retailers cost small towns $2.50 for every
dollar spent". Why bring in a large store that will ruin our quality of life and ultimately cost the town money?

In closing, ms stosser states "The opponents of any level of progress in Blacksburg are fully engaged. They believe killing the South Main
project - and future development - is a positive result."

This does not represent our position at all. We are in favor of the "proposed plan for illustrative purposes". It's the NEW PLAN with the big box store tha we are opposed to - that and all the traffic, low wage jobs, and eventual decay that it will bring.

Mark Lattanzi, concerned Blacksburg resident.

I would be interested to see

I would be interested to see who replies in support. I just received a call from an outsourced firm in Washington, DC calling to rally opposition to Ordinance 1450. It just shows that there is little to no support of Ms. Stosser's viewpoint and that no local people would volunteer to do this. I'm sure many, many citizens of Blacksburg would call in support of Ordinance 1450, myself included.